MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379804597 · doi:10.1353/nai.2015.a635789

The Erotic in Contemporary Native Women’s Poetry in Canada

2015· article· en· W4379804597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousQueerPoetryAotearoaLesbianGender studiesClosetHuman sexualityStorytellingMohawkHistoryArtSociologyLiteratureNarrativePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Erotic in Contemporary Native Women’s Poetry in Canada Jennifer Andrews (bio) The erotic . . . “forms the bridge between the spiritual and the political.” . . . It is creation of a connection between an embodied self and the world in which that self exists. —ROBERT WARRIOR Native women’s love poetry and erotics are so invisible, so far back in the closet, that they are practically in somebody else’s apartment. —CHRYSTOS IN “RED HOT TO THE TOUCH,” Anishnaabe poet, editor, and publisher Kateri Akiwenzie-Damm argues for the need to “bring the erotic back into Indigenous arts” by depicting Aboriginal female sexuality, in particular, in a celebratory fashion (113). She eschews long-standing stereotypical depictions of Indigenous woman as passive objects of male exploitation and violence, especially as inflicted by white Western men as part of the ongoing project of colonization. Akiwenzie-Damm has collected and edited a groundbreaking collection of Indigenous erotica from writers of both sexes living in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Aotearoa (New Zealand) titled Without Reservation: Indigenous Erotica. She has also contributed to Drew Hayden Taylor’s Me Sexy: An Exploration of Native Sex and Sexuality, a provocative and compelling compilation of essays and creative work on Indigenous sexualities. More recently, Playwrights Canada Press published Two-Spirit Acts: Queer Indigenous Performances, a trio of performance scripts that include Muriel Miguel’s Hot’n’Soft, which first premiered in Toronto in 1991 and explicitly depicts “lesbian erotica” (xxi) by eschewing what Daniel Heath Justice has called the “sexaphobic settler regime” (208). And an essay in the just-published volume Indigenous Poetics in Canada, Anishnaabe poet and scholar Waaseyaa’sin Christine Sy describes the impact of many of these publications on her own work, highlighting how Akiwenzie-Damm and other Native writers of the erotic have inspired her to explore “our sexuality and sensuality, our way of writing our life force” (189). Despite this growing body of primary texts, relatively little critical attention has been paid to the popularity of Native erotica as manifested in the work of Indigenous women and especially poets within Canada. [End Page 134] This silence is not surprising, given that writing erotica is perceived as especially risky for Native authors who remain marginalized, regardless of their sexual orientation, within the nation-state. In “Decolonizing the Queer Native Body,” Chris Finley explains that while “Natives, and lots of other folks, like sex,” they “are terrified to discuss it” because it may endanger the speaker or writer by unearthing “the colonial legacies of sexual violence” (32) and their ongoing impact on tribal peoples. The structures of colonialism in Canada and the United States, as Mark Rifkin outlines, historically depended—and in many cases, still do—on the enforcement of “compulsory heterosexuality” (2011b, 5) to ensure the perpetuation of a fundamentally white, Christian, patriarchal form of nationhood, one in which any Indigenous “emotional and bodily sensation,” especially those which challenge established institutions of governance, is strategically discounted or ignored (2012, 27). Within this framework, Native women are useful for one purpose: to bear children, whose white fathers will ensure their racial integration. Conversely, Indigenous men are unacknowledged as subjects in their own right or they are feminized to induce their complicity. As Finley points out, “It is not only Native women who are (hetero)sexually controlled by white heteropatriarchy, for Native men are feminized and queered when put in the care of a white heteropatriarchal nation-state” (35). Paradoxically some of the most important recent critical interventions in the field of queer theory continue to rely on a “primitivist notion of the indigenous as the space of free and unfettered sexuality that allows the white queer citizen to remake his or her sexuality” without actually forging relationships of solidarity with Indigenous peoples when it comes to their “land struggles” (Smith, 49). For all the promise of queer theory’s desire to represent marginal populations, the colonization and erasure of Indigenous peoples remains a fundamental problem. Likewise, Andrea Smith notes that in much contemporary ethnic and queer of color work, Indigenous subjects who attach themselves to a land base or insist on “nationalistic identifications” rather than that of the diasporic or Mestizo subject are perceived as...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207