MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4379805695 · doi:10.1353/cro.2011.a783215

Miłosz and a secular age

2011· article· pl· W4379805695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Łukasz Tischner

Bibliographic record

VenueCrossCurrents · 2011
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfessionalPoetryLiteratureCLARITYHistorySecularityAge of EnlightenmentPhilosophySociologyPoliticsArtReligious studiesLawTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jak łatwo się domyślić, ja opancerzone nie zna "antystruktury" i polega na tym, co podsuwa mu rozum instrumentalny. Wierząc w jego moc, więzi sam siebie w weberowskiej "żelaznej klatce" - poddaje się dyktatowi zasady efektywności i osłabia swe więzi z innymi. Niedostępne jest mu doświadczenie karnawałowego "communitas", czyli spontanicznej i fundamentalnej wspólnoty poza systemem ról i hierarchii dominujących w danym społeczeństwie. Temat mojego artykułu zdaje się dość wyczerpująco opisany, w dodatku sam Miłosz wielokrotnie podejmował go w swej poezji i esejach. Wystarczy wspomnieć Ziemię Ulro, w której badał przyczyny erozji wyobraźni religijnej, czy ostatni tom wierszy wydany za jego życia - Drugą przestrzeń, z Traktatem teologicznym na czele Do jego ponownego podjęcia skłoniła mnie jednak lektura fundamentalnej monografii Charlesa Taylora A Secular Age, która w ciągu roku od wydania zdołała już zyskać miano klasycznej. Warto nadmienić, że wybitny kanadyjski filozof przywołuje w niej Ziemię Ulro, choć Miłosz nie gości często na jej stronach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrossCurrents→Same topicEducation and Cultural Studies→French-language works237,207→