MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379877961 · doi:10.2514/6.2023-3855

A Methodology for Sizing Rotorcraft De-icing Systems Based on Ice Adhesion Strength

2023· article· en· W4379877961 on OpenAlexaff
Nick Tepylo, Marc Budinger, Valérie Pommier‐Budinger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcingIcing conditionsSizingRotor (electric)Aerospace engineeringAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceMarine engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-3855.vid Aircraft have long been plagued by ice formation on critical surfaces, which can have catastrophic consequences. Helicopters are prone to the effects of icing and equipping their main rotor blades with an ice protection system (IPS) may be difficult due to the rotating frame and the large de-icing power requirements compared to the total available power on the helicopter. A methodology is presented for calculating the heating requirements from an electro-thermal IPS to maintain a clean rotor blade surface. The influence of ice adhesion strength is considered making the model applicable to novel IPS which incorporate icephobic coatings. Results for a Eurocopter AS332 Super Puma show the majority of icing conditions requiring a total power between 15 to 30 kW for full ice shedding and a reduction in power of 20 to 77% in light and moderate icing conditions when considering the reduction in shedding force from an icephobic coating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207