MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379879698 · doi:10.55095/achot2010/038

Evidence for the Best Treatment for Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures

2010· article· en· W4379879698 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalcaneusOrthodonticsIntra articularSurgeryOsteoarthritisPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In conclusion, this clinical scenario has proved to be a clinic conundrum.Unfortunately the surgical team may focus on the fracture and may overlook significant patient characteristics that could help in guiding optimal patient care.Operative management is the treatment of choice as long as complications can be minimized.Nonoperative care can lead to succesful results in select patients in a high percentage of cases.Percutaneous fixation and arthroscopic reduction are new areas for scientific study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae CechoslovacaSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207