Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Horizon Scan summarizes information related to hybrid operating room suites for surgical procedures beyond thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and emergency vascular surgery, including a list of some of the hybrid operating rooms in Canada, a description of some related published studies, and a summary of some important considerations, such as patient and provider experiences and facility planning. Hybrid operating rooms combine medical imaging and conventional surgical suites into 1 treatment space and can be used for both minimally invasive and open surgical procedures. They allow surgeons to perform imaging, biopsy, diagnosis, and surgery all in the same room and remove the need to move a patient between an imaging suite and an operating room. Evidence suggests that the use of hybrid operating rooms can result in improved patient outcomes and decreased procedure times. Radiation safety for both providers and patients is an important consideration when implementing the use of hybrid operating rooms. The use of hybrid operating rooms is well established for thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, and emergency vascular surgery; and is emerging for surgeries such as gynecological, urological, and orthopedic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it