PENGARUH DISIPLIN, MOTIVASI KERJA DAN BUDAYA KERJA TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN DINAS KEARSIPAN DAN PERPUSTAKAAN KOTA MATARAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk menganalisis Pengaruh disiplin, motivasi kerja, dan budaya kerja terhadap kualitas pelayanan Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Mataram secara parsial (mandiri) maupun secara simultan (bersama-sama). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif melalui metode sampel survei dengan tehnik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara responden dengan alat analisis kuesioner. Menggunakan dua populasi yaitu pegawai Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Mataram dan juga pengunjung Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Mataram dengan tehnik pengambilan sampel non-probability sampling yaitu accidental untuk pengunjung dengan mengambil 39 orang pengunjung sebagai responden. Sedangkan untuk pegawai Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Mataram mengambil keseluruhan populasi sebagai responden yaitu 39 orang pegawai. Pengujian hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan uji instrument penelitian uji validitas dan reabilitas, uji asumsi klasik, uji hipotesis dan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa disiplin pegawai, motivasi kerja, dan budaya kerja berpengaruh dan signifikan terhadap kualitas pelayanan Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Mataram secara parsial (mandiri) maupun secara simultan (bersama-sama).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".