MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379930065 · doi:10.7202/1100246ar

Tisser des relations : dialogue autour de la pratique de la filature 1

2023· article· fr· W4379930065 on OpenAlex
Nancy Aumais, Consuelo Vásquez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches qualitatives · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article interroge l’impératif d’objectivité et de distanciation qui est promu dans la recherche qualitative. À travers un dialogue sur nos expériences de filature, nous montrons que cet impératif se traduit notamment par la métaphore de l’ombre – présente dans le terme anglais shadowing – qui sous-tend cette démarche. Nous proposons une métaphore alternative de la filature comme tissage de relations, laquelle permet de souligner la nature profondément relationnelle et incarnée de cette démarche reposant sur la création et le développement d’une relation intime entre la personne fileuse (la chercheuse) et la personne filée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.139
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.146
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1390.146
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.473
GPT teacher head0.617
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it