A Survey of Lateral Stability Criterion and Control Application for Autonomous Vehicles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing requirements for vehicle driving safety improvement have led to numerous and in-depth studies on vehicle stability, especially for autonomous vehicles. The main concerns of vehicle stability research in autonomous vehicles include the vehicle stability analyzing, criterion constructing and controller designing. Therefore, this paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art vehicle stability criterion and control application for autonomous vehicles. First, the lateral vehicle linear stability criterion and widely-used active stability control applications are introduced. Next, the nonlinear vehicle stability analysis algorithm and criterion, based on the well-known phase plane method, are discussed in detail. The stability controller design, including the activation strategy and tracking objectives, is reviewed. In addition, emerging research challenges and trends for future improvement in lateral stabilization of autonomous vehicles are finally summarized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it