MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379931088 · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2023.3284215

AR-UNet: A Deformable Image Registration Network with Cyclic Training

2023· article· en· W4379931088 on OpenAlexafffund
Hanchong Zhou, Henry Leung, Bhashyam Balaji

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceImage registrationComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Discriminative modelComputer visionGenerative modelResidualPattern recognition (psychology)Generative grammarImage (mathematics)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deformable image registration is a process to determine the non-linear spatial correspondence among deformed image pairs. Generative registration network is a novel structure involving a generative registration network and a discriminative network that encourages the former to generate better results. We propose an Attention Residual UNet (AR-UNet) to estimate the complicated deformation field. The model is trained using perceptual cyclic constraints. As an unsupervised method, we require labelling for training and use virtual data augmentation to improve the robustness of the proposed model. We also introduce comprehensive metrics for image registration comparison. Experimental results show quantitative evidence that the method can predict reliable deformation field at a reasonable speed and outperform conventional learning based and non-learning based deformable image registration methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207