MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379961446 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03865

Simultaneous Position-and-Stiffness Control of Underactuated Antagonistic Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots

2023· preprint· en· W4379961446 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bowen Yi, Yeman Fan, Dikai Liu, José Guadalupe Romero

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Technology Sydney
KeywordsUnderactuationRobotStiffnessControl theory (sociology)Flexibility (engineering)Computer scienceRoboticsControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Structural engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuum robots have gained widespread popularity due to their inherent compliance and flexibility, particularly their adjustable levels of stiffness for various application scenarios. Despite efforts to dynamic modeling and control synthesis over the past decade, few studies have incorporated stiffness regulation into their feedback control design; however, this is one of the initial motivations to develop continuum robots. This paper addresses the crucial challenge of controlling both the position and stiffness of underactuated continuum robots actuated by antagonistic tendons. We begin by presenting a rigid-link dynamical model that can analyze the open-loop stiffening of tendon-driven continuum robots. Based on this model, we propose a novel passivity-based position-and-stiffness controller that adheres to the non-negative tension constraint. Comprehensive experiments on our continuum robot validate the theoretical results and demonstrate the efficacy and precision of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207