A phase II, open‐label, multicenter study of capivasertib, a potent, oral pan‐AKT inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (CAPITAL)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an established therapeutic target in indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Several PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki) have been approved to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Nonetheless, potential class-specific and PI3K isoform-related toxicities may limit their clinical utility. Capivasertib is an oral, potent, selective pan-AKT inhibitor that has demonstrated evidence of survival benefit in phase 2 clinical studies in patients with solid tumors. Capivasertib has also shown a manageable safety profile and unlike PI3Ki, colitis or pneumonitis do not feature as noted toxicities. Here, we report preliminary safety and efficacy data from a phase II study evaluating capivasertib in pts with R/R B-NHL (NCT05008055). Methods: Eligible pts were adults (≥18 years) with R/R NHL including histologically confirmed FL, MZL, and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Pts received capivasertib 480 mg orally twice daily using an intermittent schedule of 4 days on/3 days off in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed by investigators based on the modified Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria (Cheson, et al. JCO 2014). Baseline PTEN status and genomics will be correlated with clinical efficacy. Results: At data cut off (DCO; December 21, 2022), 15 pts with R/R B-NHL had been treated (histology: FL [n = 11], MZL [n = 2], MCL [n = 2]). Pts had a median age of 55 (range 40–87) years and had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (2–5), including prior PI3Ki (n = 6), and autologous stem cell transplant (n = 1). Six (40%) pts were refractory to their most recent therapy. Median follow-up for dosed pts was 5 (range 1–11) months. Treatment was ongoing in 9 (60%) pts. 11/13 pts with FL or MZL were evaluable for efficacy (FL 10/11, MZL 1/2). ORR was 54%; 8% of pts had a CR, 46% had a PR, 23% had SD, and 8% had PD. No response data are available for the MCL cohort because both pts were not evaluable at DCO. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 3 pts: COVID-19, QT prolongation, and rash; no grade ≥3 infections other than COVID-19 were reported. No immune-mediated adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. One (7%) pt discontinued due to TEAE (grade 3 QT prolongation). The most common TEAEs (≥25% of patients) were diarrhea (93%), fatigue (27%), and nausea (27%). Diarrhea events were all grade 1 (57%) or 2 (43%) and mainly occurred on dosing days. Conclusions: Capivasertib demonstrated single-agent activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with heavily pretreated R/R FL. Notably, no immune-mediated events and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Capivasertib has the potential to be an alternative therapeutic option for pts with R/R B-NHL, with a non-overlapping safety profile compared to currently available PI3Ki. Encore Abstract - previously submitted to EHA 2023 The research was funded by AstraZeneca Keywords: Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Molecular Targeted Therapies Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. D. Hodson Research funding: AstraZeneca, paid to institution Other remuneration: Editorial support for abstract, paid to institution G. Shouse Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie Honoraria: Kite Pharma, Beigene A. Salar Honoraria: Beigene, Incyte, Janssen, Roche Other remuneration: Abbvie, Roche S. Bobillo Honoraria: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche R. Cordoba Honoraria: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Genmab, Incyte, Janssen, Kite, Kyowa-Kirin, Roche, Takeda J. Radford Consultant or advisory role: ADC Therapeutics, BMS, Kite Pharma, Takeda Stock ownership: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca Honoraria: ADC Therapeutics, BMS Research funding: Takeda Other remuneration: ADC Therapeutics, Takeda S. Guidez Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Gilead Kite, Incyte, Takeda A. F. Herrera Consultant or advisory role: Adicet Bio; AstraZeneca, BMS, Caribou, Genentech, Genmab, Karyopharm, Merck, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Tubulis Research funding: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, KiTE Pharma, Merck, Pfizer F. Morchhauser Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Novartis, Roche Honoraria: Chugai, Roche D. Johnson Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca M. Izuzquiza Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca N. Sambamurthy Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca A. Forcina Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca G. Gorgun Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca R. Chen Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca A. Younes Employment or leadership position: AstraZeneca M. Wang Consultant or advisory role: AstraZeneca, BMS, Gilead, Incyte, Nanostring, Novartis, Roche Honoraria: Abbvie Research funding: Astex, Argen X, GSK Educational grants: AstraZeneca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".