MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4379983719 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1662

Abstract 1662: Understanding the sensitivity of cancer cells to myristoylation inhibitors for oncology applications

2023· article· en· W4379983719 on OpenAlexaff
Erwan Beauchamp, Chistopher Cromwell, Eman W. Moussa, Aishwarya Iyer, Megan C. Yap, Rony Pain, Jay M. Gamma, Olivier Julien, Basil P. Hubbard, Luc G. Berthiaume

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerCancer researchCancer cellBiologyLymphomaKinaseCell cultureOvarian cancerInternal medicineOncologyMedicineCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PCLX-001 is a first-in-kind drug that targets a protein modification essential for membrane anchorage and signalling, and has been under human clinical trial evaluation for the treatment of lymphoma and solid malignancies for over a year. In human, over 600 proteoforms are modified with the fatty acid myristate by two N-myristoyltransferases: NMT1 and NMT2. These include many proto-oncogenic proteins (e.g. Src-family kinases and c-Abl) and metabolic regulators (e.g. AMPK β subunit). Thus, we validated the potential of NMTs as oncology targets on 300 cancer cell lines and uncovered its potential in hematological cancers. The multiple substrates of NMTs complicated the elucidation of a clear mechanism of action of the pan-NMT inhibitor PCLX-001. To circumvent this, we evaluated the individual roles of NMT1 and NMT2 in tumours as well as their relative contributions, including those of their substrates, to PCLX-001 sensitivity. Analysis of TCGA and CCLE databases revealed that NMT2 expression levels vary drastically (7 log2(TPM+1)) while those of NMT1 vary slightly (3 log2(TPM+1)). Hematological cancers comprised the vast majority of the lowest NMT2 expressing cells but lower NMT2 levels were also observed in solid tumour cell lines (e.g. breast & ovary). NMT2 levels were also lower in cancer versus normal corresponding tissues. We confirmed that NMT2 expression is epigenetically repressed at a CpG island found in the 5´end of the NMT2 gene thereby explaining the reduction in NMT2 expression. Since most hematological cancer cells are NMT2-deficient, we think that by targeting the remaining NMT1, PCLX-001 selectively kills these cells in a manner reminiscent of synthetic lethality, thereby sparing normal human cells with two NMTs. Therefore, identifying substrates specific to NMT1 in NMT2-deficient cancer cells became of the utmost importance to understand which NMT1 protein substrates were critical for survival. Using differential proteomics in the CRISPR/Cas9 NMT1 KO HAP1 near-haploid cell line derived from the chronic myelogenous leukemia versus WT HAP1 cells, we surprisingly found that few signaling proteins were downregulated, rather, 36 mitochondrial protein levels were decreased and 18 of these belonged to respiratory complex I. Myristoylated mitochondrial protein NDUFAF4, a major complex I assembly factor, was the most downregulated and PCLX-001 reduced its levels leading to decreased complex I activity. This seemingly ordinary observation could have transformational implications for cancer treatment since oxidative phosphorylation is essential for both cancer stem cell survival and metastasis. In addition, gene set enrichment analyses performed on RNASeq data obtained from 1200 cell lines treated with myristoylation inhibitors allowed us to derive an NMT inhibition sensitivity gene set that could be used to identify patients which would most benefit from NMT inhibition therapy. Citation Format: Erwan Beauchamp, Chistopher Cromwell, Eman Moussa, Aishwarya Iyer, Megan Yap, Rony Pain, Jay Gamma, Olivier Julien, Basil Hubbard, Luc Berthiaume. Understanding the sensitivity of cancer cells to myristoylation inhibitors for oncology applications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1662.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207