MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380032401 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3284947

Intelligent Suppression of Non-Maneuvering Magnetic Interference of Aeromagnetic UAV

2023· article· en· W4380032401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMagnetometerInterference (communication)Magnetic fieldMagnetic dipoleAeromagnetic surveyMagnetic surveyFluxgate compassElectromagnetic interferenceElectronic engineeringAcousticsComputer scienceEngineeringMagnetic anomalyControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsGeophysicsArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the aeromagnetic survey based on a fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the non-maneuvering magnetic interference generated by the magnetic components can significantly reduce the data quality of the airborne magnetometer. Aircraft layout modification is a standard method of addressing this problem. However, the existing layout modification methods rely heavily on personal experience and cannot precisely determine the overall layout of multiple magnetic components quantitatively and cooperatively. Even if the layout of magnetic components is determined through multiple experiments, obtaining an optimal suppression effect of the magnetic interference is difficult. An intelligent suppression method of non-maneuvering magnetic interference is proposed to address this problem. An eccentric multi-magnetic dipole (EMMD) model that can accurately characterize the primary magnetic components is established; then, an intelligent cooperative optimization method for the layout of magnetic components based on the Aquila Optimizer (AO) algorithm is proposed to quantitatively determine the optimal combination of positions and orientations of multiple components. A dedicated experimental platform, including a non-magnetic rotating stage, a three-axis fluxgate magnetic sensor, an optically pumped magnetometer, and an aeromagnetic tester, was built to validate the proposed characterization model and layout optimization method. The experimental results observed in a non-magnetic laboratory demonstrated that the goodness-of-fits of the EMMD model to the total-field and three-component magnetic interference generated by the magnetic components are all above 0.932. Furthermore, the total-field intensities of magnetic interference in the magnetometer areas located at the left and right wingtips were suppressed by 98.7% and 98.9%; the magnetic inhomogeneities in the two areas were reduced by 97.7% and 98.4%; the magnetic imbalance between the two wingtips was reduced by 95.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it