MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380047866 · doi:10.59783/aire.2023.28

Moth Luna (Actias luna)

2023· article· en· W4380047866 on OpenAlex
Alisa Kavalerskaia, Evgenia Kazachkova, Nataša Nikolić-Lukovska, Nela Marinović

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDASCO Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaturniidaeLepidoptera genitaliaDozenGeographyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Luna moth (Actias luna) is American Moon Moth also known as the Nearctic moth of the family Saturniidae, subfamily Saturniinae, a group recognized as the giant silk moth. The Luna moth is found east of the Great Plains in the United States from Florida to Maine, North America, and Saskatchewan east through central Quebec to Nova Scotia, Canada. Luna moths are rarely found as vagrants in Western Europe. In June 1987, Luna moth appeared on a United States First Class postage stamp. Within two dozen butterflies have been honored in postage stamps, this was the only moth. This remarkable critter is recognizable by its wings. But, the most interesting thing about Luna Moth is that this insect doesn’t have a digestive system or a mouth. It lives only for about a week after leaving the cocoon and never eats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it