MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380050531 · doi:10.3847/psj/acc9b1

Preatmospheric Detection of a Meter-sized Earth Impactor

2023· article· en· W4380050531 on OpenAlex
David L. Clark, Paul Wiegert, Peter Brown, Denis Vida, A. Heinze, L. Denneau

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Planetary Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAsteroidGeologyBrightnessMeteoroidApparent magnitudeMagnitude (astronomy)GeodesyNear-Earth objectRemote sensingSatellitePhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract On 2020 September 18 U.S. Government (USG) sensors detected a bolide with peak bolometric magnitude of −19 over the Western Pacific. The impact was also detected by the Geostationary Lightning Mapper instrument on the GOES-17 satellite and infrasound sensors in Hawaii. The USG measurements reported a steep entry angle of 67° from horizontal from a radiant 13° east of north and an impact speed of 11.7 km s −1 . Interpretation of all energy yields produces a preferred energy estimate of 0.4 kt TNT, corresponding to a 23,000 kg, 3 m diameter meteoroid. A postimpact search of telescopic images found that the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System survey captured the object just 10 minutes prior to impact at an Earth-centered distance of nearly 11,900 km with apparent magnitude m = 12.5. The object appears as a 0.44° streak originating on the eastern edge of the image, extending one-third of the USG state-vector-based prediction of 1.26° over the 30 s exposure. The streak shows brightness variability consistent with small asteroid rotation. The position of Earth’s shadow, the object’s size, and its consistency with the reported USG state vector confirm the object is likely natural. This is the eighth preatmospheric detection of a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) impactor and the closest initial telescopic detection prior to impact. The high altitude of peak fireball brightness suggests it was a weak object comparable in many respects with 2008 TC3 (the Almahata Sitta meteorite), with an absolute magnitude H = 32.5 and likely low albedo. Therefore, we suggest the NEA was a C-complex asteroid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it