Repenser la place des enfants dans le tourisme durable et responsable : une revue de la littérature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article porte sur la place des enfants dans les stratégies de tourisme durable et responsable. Il s’inscrit dans un contexte où le caractère intergénérationnel des enjeux de durabilité exige que les enfants soient impliqués au même titre que toutes les autres parties prenantes. L’article consiste en une revue de littérature sur les champs des enfants et du tourisme. Il propose de redonner une place stratégique majeure à cette cible qui semble avoir été minorée par les praticiens comme les académiques. Cet article montre entre autres que la société joue une fonction castratrice (celle du Capitaine Crochet) qui vise à maintenir les enfants le plus longtemps que possible dans l’infantilité (celle de Peter Pan/Tanguy), et suggère la pertinence de la participation des enfants dans les stratégies de durabilité comme Indicateur de Tourisme Durable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".