MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

What’s New in Transradial Access

2023· article· en· W4380053289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brigitte Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueEMJ Interventional Cardiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMerit Medical Systems
KeywordsMedicineSession (web analytics)Conventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionRadial arteryMedical physicsSurgeryArteryComputer scienceCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transradial access (TRA) is a key strategy to avoid bleeding during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary angiography, as it reduces the risk of bleeding associated with transfemoral access (TFA). The distal radial artery (dRA) is located at the anatomical snuffbox, or radial fossa, which is a triangular depression on the lateral aspect of the dorsum of the hand. Distal transradial access (dTRA) at the anatomical snuffbox has recently gained interest as a non-femoral alternative access route for vascular procedures. Opportunities and challenges in the TRA/dTRA space include adoption of different and more complex procedures, technical innovation in access and haemostasis, and financial savings for institutions and healthcare systems. Historically, the adoption of TRA has been concentrated among interventional cardiologists, with much less adoption in the interventional radiology, vascular surgery, and neurointerventional radiology communities. This article highlights key aspects of the Think Radial webinar, an educational training session conducted by Merit Medical. The training session was conducted by three experts: Sandeep Nathan, Department of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Illinois, USA; Darren Klass, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada; and Ajit Puri, New England Center for Stroke Research, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, USA, all of whom have a wealth of experience in vascular access. The experts provided valuable insights into topics such as why and how to adopt a dTRA approach, the value of ultrasound for guided vascular access, and dTRA and ultrasound tips and techniques. The experts also explored the challenges in transradial intervention and management of radial access complications. Drawing on their individual specialist knowledge, the experts concluded with presentations on PCI, radial approaches in interventional radiology, and dRA access in neurointervention. The aim of this educational article is to disseminate key information on TRA provided by the experts to guide and update healthcare practitioners, particularly interventional cardiologists and interventional radiologists, working in vascular access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMJ Interventional CardiologySame topicVascular Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207