MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380077375 · doi:10.1177/10443894231167640

Emotional Experience of Families With an Immigrant Background Throughout the Autism Service Trajectory in Early Childhood

2023· article· en· W4380077375 on OpenAlexafffund
Mélina Boulé, Mélina Rivard

Bibliographic record

VenueFamilies in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsAutismPsychologyImmigrationDevelopmental psychologyIntervention (counseling)Qualitative researchService (business)PsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The way through first suspicion of developmental delays to the time a diagnosis of autism is confirmed can be a long and emotional road. Additional challenges are faced by families with an immigrant background who must learn to navigate an unfamiliar health and social service care system. The current study aims to document the variability of emotional experiences reported by parents with an immigrant background through the autism service trajectory, from the first suspicions of a developmental delay to school entry. Eighteen families participated in two semistructured interviews regarding their autism service trajectory. By using an inductive qualitative content analysis, findings revealed specific contexts in which strong emotional experiences were expressed and made it possible to identify targets for intervention at key moments to support parental psychological well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamilies in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social ServicesSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207