MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380079804 · doi:10.1002/hon.3164_441

CCTG LY18‐A phase I master protocol of novel combination therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma ‐ the RGDP‐Venetoclax substudy

2023· article· en· W4380079804 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sarit Assouline, Diego Villa, Annette E. Hay, Nathalie A. Johnson, Michael Crump, Robert Kridel, Anca Prica, A. Shamy, Alina S. Gerrie, Kerry J. Savage, Jacqueline Kelly, Lois E. Shepherd, B. Chen, John Kuruvilla, Farheen Manji

Bibliographic record

VenueHematological Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkQueen's UniversitySpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersLoxo OncologyAbbVie CanadaNational Institutes of HealthPharmacyclicsNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkBreast Cancer Research FoundationTG TherapeuticsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsGenentechCelgeneGilead Sciences
KeywordsMedicineSalvage therapyInternal medicineGemcitabineRituximabOncologyFollicular lymphomaLymphomaRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyCancerChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Therapies for relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphomas are expanding. Chemo-immunotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains an important therapeutic option with survival benefit. About 50% of patients (pts) have an adequate response to salvage therapy which is required to proceed to ASCT. Novel salvage regimens may increase response and transplantation rate. Methods: LY.18 is a Canadian Cancer Trials Group Phase I platform trial of novel salvage regimens for patients with r/r large B cell lymphoma. RGDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin) plus venetoclax (RGDP-V) was evaluated in adult pts with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma, or high-grade B cell lymphoma after one prior line of therapy. RGDP was administered at standard doses (Crump, JCO, 2014) for up to 3 cycles pre-transplant. V was administered at increasing dose levels (200–800 mg) according to a 3+3 design, with dose limiting toxicity (DLT) assessed in cycle one. The recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was the primary outcome. Pts with a partial or complete response (PR or CR) could proceed to ASCT. Response was assessed using both the Lugano criteria and RECIL. Results: Since Sept 2020, 18 pts have been treated at 5 dose levels. Severe myelotoxicity was noted in the first dose level with 2 DLTs observed in the first 4 pts. The trial was amended to mandate G-CSF days 9 to 14 with each cycle of therapy (Table 1). Median age was 59, 4 pts were ≥65 years, 8 were female, median ECOG was 1 (range 0 to 3). Two of 3 pts experienced a DLT at the 800 mg dose. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is RGDP-V 400 mg days 4 to 10 of cycle 1, and days 1 to 10 of cycles 2 and 3. There were 7 serious adverse events in 5 pts, including febrile neutropenia (n = 3); grade 2 bacteremia (n = 1); and grade 3 abdominal pain, C2 fracture from fall, and supraventricular tachycardia (n = 1 each), all unrelated. There were 4 deaths on trial; 3 disease related, 1 from transplant-related complications. All grade treatment emergent adverse events occurring in at least 20% of patients were tinnitus, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, fatigue, pain, headache, and back pain. Grade 3 or greater anemia was seen in 33%, neutropenia in 78%, and thrombocytopenia in 61% of pts. The ORR in 16 evaluable pts was 75% (12/16) (95% CI: 51.7%–92.4%) by both Lugano criteria and RECIL; 2 pts were in CR by Lugano criteria and 3 pts by RECIL. Responses were seen across all dose levels. Stem cell collection >2.0 × 106 CD34+cells/kg was achieved in 9 of 10 pts in whom it was attempted. All 10 pts were successfully transplanted. 4 pts received CART therapy, 1 following progression post ASCT. Conclusion: RGDP-V 400 mg is safe and feasible with encouraging early response rates. Neutropenia was a key toxicity and can be mitigated with prophylactic G-CSF. LY.18 will expand to include 6 more patients at the RP2D. The research was funded by: AbbVie Corporation, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd Keywords: Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Combination Therapies Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. S. Assouline Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, BMS, AstraZeneca, Janssen, BeiGene, Pfizer, Roche Research funding: Novartis Canada D. Villa Honoraria: Janssen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Roche, ONO Pharmaceuticals, Zetagen Research funding: Roche, AstraZeneca A. Hay Research funding: AbbVie, Janssen, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Roche, Karyopharm M. Crump Honoraria: Kyte/Gilead and Novartis Research funding: Roche and Epizyme (Institution) R. Kridel Research funding: Abbvie, Acerta Educational grants: Eisai A. Shamy Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, BMS, BeiGene, Tahoe, Roche Honoraria: Abbvie, BMS, BeiGene, Tahoe, Roche A. Gerrie Honoraria: Abbvie, Astrazeneca, Janssen, Beigene K. Savage Consultant or advisory role: Seagen Honoraria: BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Abbvie Research funding: BMS(self), Roche(Institution) Other remuneration: Regeneron(DSMC), Beigen (Steering Committee) L. Shepherd Research funding: AbbVie, Janssen, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Roche, Karyopharm J. Kuruvilla Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, Antengene, BMS, Gilead, Karopharym, Merck, Roche and Settale Genetics Honoraria: Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Seattle Genetics Research funding: Roche, Astra Zeneca and Merck Other remuneration: DSMB for Karyopharm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHematological OncologySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207