MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380081486 · doi:10.3390/jcdd10060251

Clinical Use of Blood Flow Analysis through 4D-Flow Imaging in Aortic Valve Disease

2023· review· en· W4380081486 on OpenAlexafffund
Omer Mansoor, Julio García

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersSiemens HealthineersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsBicuspid aortic valveMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineRegurgitation (circulation)StenosisAortic valveMagnetic resonance imagingBlood flowAortaPopulationBicuspid valveAortic valve regurgitationRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which affects 1% of the general population, results from the abnormal fusion of the cusps of the aortic valve. BAV can lead to the dilatation of the aorta, aortic coarctation, development of aortic stenosis (AS), and aortic regurgitation. Surgical intervention is usually recommended for patients with BAV and bicuspid aortopathy. This review aims to examine 4D-flow imaging as a tool in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessing abnormal blood flow and its clinical application in BAV and AS. We present a historical clinical approach summarizing evidence of abnormal blood flow in aortic valve disease. We highlight how abnormal flow patterns can contribute to the development of aortic dilatation and novel flow-based biomarkers that can be used for a better understanding of the disease progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207