MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380081976 · doi:10.1093/jrssig/qmad042

Data at the Ballet

2023· article· en· W4380081976 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Matiussi, Joseph W. Shaw

Bibliographic record

VenueSignificance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletAnalyticsArtVisual artsData scienceComputer scienceDance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ballet isn’t the first thing that springs to mind when you think of data analytics. But those tasked with taking care of dancers’ health and well-being depend heavily on statistics to make the best decisions. Adam Matiussi and Joseph Shaw of The Royal Ballet explain

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.104
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.104
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2290.123

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSignificanceSame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207