MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380086256 · doi:10.48075/rd.v9i2.31234

As fontes da vontade de crença

2023· article· pt· W4380086256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista DIAPHONÍA · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsVale (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O principal objetivo deste estudo é seguir as pegadas de Nietzsche diante da compreensão daquilo no qual se sustenta a vontade de crença. O alvo de suas críticas está na crença que busca no exterior a fonte da força. Para este tipo de crente, o que realmente importa são os resultados positivos da crença em algo, muito mais do que a certeza da existência daquilo no qual se crê. Considerando que este tipo de vontade é desestabilizado e que a realidade representa a transitoriedade, esta é negada na busca de um ponto fixo, ideal ou extramundano. É assim que a crença torna o mundo suportável, mesmo que seja a partir da negação do mesmo. Esta estratégia é a conditio sine quae non para a sobrevivência e fortalecimento da vontade fraca. O que Nietzsche quer mostrar é que da necessidade de crer em algo não se segue a existência daquilo no qual se crê. Mas antes revela o tipo de vontade que se esconde atrás deste modo valorativo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it