MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380087535 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxad028

RE: Position Statement: Using probiotics in paediatric populations, PCH Dec 2022, 27, 482–491

2023· article· en· W4380087535 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition statementPediatricsStatement (logic)MedicineChild healthLibrary sciencePosition (finance)Family medicineHistoryPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article RE: Position Statement: Using probiotics in paediatric populations, PCH Dec 2022, 27, 482–491 Get access Richard S Taylor, MB BS FRCPC Richard S Taylor, MB BS FRCPC Neonatologist, Department of Pediatrics, University of Victoria, BC, Canada rstay@shaw.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Paediatrics & Child Health, Volume 28, Issue 5, August 2023, Page 267, https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxad028 Published: 03 June 2023 Article history Received: 13 February 2023 Published: 03 June 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicInfant Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207