MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380148692 · doi:10.3171/2023.3.peds22373

Vasospasm following brain tumor resection in children: institutional experience and systematic review

2023· review· en· W4380148692 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rakan Bokhari, Lior M. Elkaim, Nathan A. Shlobin, Naif M. Alotaibi, Abdulrahman J. Sabbagh, Alexander G. Weil, Saleh Baeesa, Roy Dudley, Jeffrey Atkinson, Jean‐Pierre Farmer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVasospasmSubarachnoid hemorrhageCraniopharyngiomaPopulationComplicationSurgeryPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) associated with vasospasm is well described in the setting of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In addition, DCI is very infrequently encountered in patients who have undergone resection of a brain tumor with unclear pathophysiology. The occurrence of DCI in the pediatric population is exceedingly rare, and outcomes in this population have, to the authors' knowledge, never been systematically reviewed. Therefore, the authors present what is to their knowledge the largest series of pediatric patients with this complication and systematically reviewed the literature for individual participant data. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 172 sellar and suprasellar tumors in pediatric patients who underwent surgery at the Montreal Children's Hospital between 1999 and 2017 to identify cases of vasospasm occurring after tumor resection. Descriptive statistics, including patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative findings, and outcome status, were collected. A systematic review was also conducted using three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase) to identify reported cases available in the literature of vasospasm after tumor resection in children and collect individual participant data on these patients for further analysis. RESULTS: Six patients treated at Montreal Children's Hospital were identified, with an average age of 9.5 years (range 6-15 years). The prevalence of vasospasm after tumor resection was 3.5% (6/172). Vasospasm in all 6 patients occurred after craniotomy was performed to treat a suprasellar tumor. The average interval from surgery to symptoms was 3.25 days (range 12 hours-10 days). The most common tumor etiology was craniopharyngioma, seen in 4 cases. Extensive tumor encasement of blood vessels requiring significant operative manipulation was described in all 6 patients. A rapid decrease in serum sodium (exceeding 12 mEq/L/24 hrs or below 135 mEq/L) was seen in 4 patients. On final follow-up, 3 patients were left with significant disability, and all patients had persistent deficits. A systematic review of the literature revealed a total of 10 other patients whose characteristics and treatment were compared with those of the 6 patients treated at Montreal Children's Hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Vasospasm after tumor resection in children and youth is likely a rare entity, with a prevalence of 3.5% in this case series. Suprasellar tumor location (particularly craniopharyngioma tumor etiology), significant encasement of blood vessels by the tumor, and postoperative hyponatremia may be predictive factors. Outcome is poor, with most patients having significant persistent neurological deficits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery PediatricsSame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207