Novel Traffic Conflict-Based Framework for Real-Time Traffic Safety Evaluation Under Heterogeneous and Weak Lane-Discipline Traffic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study proposed a real-time traffic safety evaluation framework using macroscopic flow variables. To this end, open-access extended vehicle trajectories were employed. Rear-end traffic conflicts and macroscopic traffic flow variables were derived from the trajectory data and were integrated for real-time safety evaluation. The Proportion of Stopping distance ( PSD ) accounts for all types of interactions (both safe and unsafe) in the traffic stream; therefore, the same was adopted to analyze the rear-end traffic conflicts. A macroscopic indicator termed “time spent in conflict ( TSC )” was derived to evaluate the rear-end traffic conflicts. Machine learning models, namely, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were employed to predict TSCs using macroscopic traffic flow variables. The results revealed that the TSC computed based on PSD exhibits a reliable and explainable relationship with the macroscopic traffic flow variables. TSC computed based on PSD revealed that intermediately congested traffic flow conditions are critical in traffic safety and can be attributed to complex traffic phenomena such as traffic hysteresis, traffic oscillations, and increased speed variance. Moreover, a stable relation between traffic safety and traffic flow was suggested for varying threshold values. Among different machine learning models, the RF model was observed as the best-fitted model to predict TSC based on macroscopic traffic variables. TSC quantifies the safety status of a given traffic flow condition, where a higher value of TSC for a particular traffic flow condition indicates that vehicles prevail in the conflicting scenario for a longer time and, therefore, reflect higher operational risk. The developed machine learning model can be employed to predict TSC (operational risk) in real time using the macroscopic traffic flow variables and, therefore, facilitate traffic safety monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".