MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380204644 · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2023.120711

Prodromal language impairment in genetic frontotemporal dementia within the GENFI cohort

2023· article· en· W4380204644 on OpenAlexafffund
Kiran Samra, Amy MacDougall, Arabella Bouzigues, Martina Bocchetta, David M. Cash, Caroline Greaves, Rhian S. Convery, John C. van Swieten, Lize C. Jiskoot, Harro Seelaar, Fermín Moreno, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle, Robert Laforce, Caroline Graff, Mario Masellis, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, James B. Rowe, Barbara Borroni, Elizabeth Finger, Matthis Synofzik, Daniela Galimberti, Rik Vandenberghe, Alexandre de Mendonça, Christopher Butler, Alexander Gerhard, Simon Ducharme, Isabelle Le Ber, Pietro Tiraboschi, Isabel Santana, Florence Pasquier, Johannes Levin, Markus Otto, Sandro Sorbi, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Lucy L. Russell, Annabel Nelson, David L. Thomas, Emily Todd, Hanya Benotmane, Jennifer Nicholas, Rachelle Shafei, Carolyn Timberlake, Thomas Cope, Timothy Rittman, Alberto Benussi, Enrico Premi, Roberto Gasparotti, Silvana Archetti, Stefano Gazzina, Valentina Cantoni, Andrea Arighi, Chiara Fenoglio, Elio Scarpini, Giorgio Fumagalli, Vittoria Borracci, Giacomina Rossi, Giorgio Giaccone, Giuseppe Di Fede, Paola Caroppo, Sara Prioni, Veronica Redaelli, David F. Tang‐Wai, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Miguel Castelo‐Branco, Morris Freedman, Ron Keren, Sandra E. Black, Sara Mitchell, Christen Shoesmith, Robert Bartha, Rosa Rademakers, Jackie M. Poos, Janne M. Papma, Lucia Giannini, Rick van Minkelen, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Benedetta Nacmias, Camilla Ferrari, Cristina Polito, Gemma Lombardi, Valentina Bessi, Michele Veldsman, Christin Andersson, Håkan Thonberg, Linn Öijerstedt, Vesna Jelić, Paul Thompson, Tobias Langheinrich, Albert Lladó, Anna Antonell, Jaume Olives, Mircea Balasa, Núria Bargalló, Sergi Borrego‐Écija, Ana Verdelho, Carolina Maruta, Catarina B. Ferreira, Gabriel Miltenberger, Frederico Simões do Couto, Alazne Gabilondo, Ana Gorostidi, Jorge Villanúa, Marta Cañada, Mikel Tainta, Miren Zulaica, Myriam Barandiarán, Patricia Alves, Benjamin Bender, Carlo Wilke, Lisa Graf, Annick Vogels, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Philip Van Damme, Rose Bruffaerts, Koen Poesen, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Serge Gauthier, Agnès Camuzat, Alexis Brice, Anne Bertrand, Aurélie Funkiewiez, Daisy Rinaldi, Dario Saracino, Olivier Colliot, Sabrina Sayah, Catharina Prix, Elisabeth Wlasich, Olivia Wagemann, Sandra Loosli, Sonja Schönecker, Tobias Hoegen, Jolina Lombardi, Sarah Anderl‐Straub, Adeline Rollin, Grégory Kuchcinski, Maxime Bertoux, Thibaud Lebouvier, Vincent Deramecourt, Beatriz Santiago, Diana Duro, Maria João Leitão, Maria Rosário Almeida, Miguel Tábuas‐Pereira, Sónia Afonso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Neurological Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWestern UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversity of TorontoOccupational Cancer Research CentreHealth Sciences CentreMcGill University Health CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversité Laval
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUK Dementia Research InstituteMinistero della SaluteBrain Research UKDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftWolfson FoundationWellcome TrustAlzheimer's SocietyAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity College LondonEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsC9orf72Frontotemporal dementiaPsychologyFrontotemporal lobar degenerationVerbal fluency testAtrophyDementiaAphasiaAudiologyMedicinePathologyNeuropsychologyNeuroscienceDiseaseCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether language impairment exists presymptomatically in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and if so, the key differences between the main genetic mutation groups. METHODS: 682 participants from the international multicentre Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study were recruited: 290 asymptomatic and 82 prodromal mutation carriers (with C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT mutations) as well as 310 mutation-negative controls. Language was assessed using items from the Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale, as well as the Boston Naming Test (BNT), modified Camel and Cactus Test (mCCT) and a category fluency task. Participants also underwent a 3 T volumetric T1-weighted MRI from which regional brain volumes within the language network were derived and compared between the groups. RESULTS: 3% of asymptomatic (4% C9orf72, 4% GRN, 2% MAPT) and 48% of prodromal (46% C9orf72, 42% GRN, 64% MAPT) mutation carriers had impairment in at least one language symptom compared with 13% of controls. In prodromal mutation carriers significantly impaired word retrieval was seen in all three genetic groups whilst significantly impaired grammar/syntax and decreased fluency was seen only in C9orf72 and GRN mutation carriers, and impaired articulation only in the C9orf72 group. Prodromal MAPT mutation carriers had significant impairment on the category fluency task and the BNT whilst prodromal C9orf72 mutation carriers were impaired on the category fluency task only. Atrophy in the dominant perisylvian language regions differed between groups, with earlier, more widespread volume loss in C9orf72, and later focal atrophy in the temporal lobe in MAPT mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Language deficits exist in the prodromal but not asymptomatic stages of genetic FTD across all three genetic groups. Improved understanding of the language phenotype prior to phenoconversion to fully symptomatic FTD will help develop outcome measures for future presymptomatic trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Neurological SciencesSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207