Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reports have shown increased positive correlations with the salivary microbiota and pancreatic carcinogenesis. A European study showed that high levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis were correlated with periodontium damage and were associated with a risk of pancreatic cancer (two-fold). A recent study, using oral mouthwash samples (n = 361 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma), determined that the presence of P. gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans along with Fusobacteria and Leptotrichia were a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The link between pancreatic cancer and periodontitis has been documented. Interestingly, periodontitis presents with inflammation and microbial dysbiosis, both of which have been characterized in pancreatic cancer. This review highlights multiple roles in which oral anaerobic bacteria can spread to the pancreas and contribute to pancreatic cancer. World J Oncol. 2023;14(3):174-177 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1596
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".