MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380258951 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100682

Pembrolizumab-Induced Anti-GBM Glomerulonephritis: A Case Report

2023· article· en· W4380258951 on OpenAlexaff
Nidal El Yamani, Gabrielle Côté, Julie Riopel, Nicolas Marcoux, Fabrice Mac‐Way, David Philibert, Mohsen Agharazii

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineGlomerulonephritisRapidly progressive glomerulonephritisDermatologyInternal medicineImmunotherapyCancerKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are known to have a wide range of autoimmune toxicities, such as acute interstitial nephritis. Immunotherapy induced glomerulonephritis has been described, but anti-glomerular basement membrane disease (anti-GBM) is rarely reported. We present a case report of a 60-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix who was treated with pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1, and who developed severe acute kidney injury 4 months after therapy initiation. The immune workup showed a positive serum anti-GBM antibody (24 U/mL). The kidney biopsy showed crescentic glomerulonephritis with linear immunoglobulin G2 glomerular basement membrane staining, compatible with anti-GBM glomerulonephritis. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis, IV steroids, and cyclophosphamide, but she developed kidney failure, necessitating dialysis. Few case reports, such as the present case, provide a possible link between anti-GBM glomerulonephritis and immune checkpoint inhibitors, warranting early clinical suspicion and investigation in patients who are treated with these agents and subsequently develop acute kidney injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207