Bibliographic record
Abstract
For anyone first exposed to Canadian political economy in the 1960s and 1970s, Mel Watkins is an iconic figure.His strong association with the Watkins Report, commissioned by Liberal Cabinet Minister Walter Gordon in the mid-1960s, and his critical role in the drafting of the Waffle Manifesto in 1969 (documented in Dave Godfrey's Gordon to Watkins to You) earned him instant recognition among a generation of students and activists deeply concerned with the growing degree of foreign control over the Canadian economy and the inadequate response to the issue by the mainstream political parties of the day.Political activism, through his subsequent involvement with the Berger Inquiry in the 1970s and his passionate opposition to the Free Trade Agreement and the nafta in the 1980s and 1990s, remains a central part of Mel's contribution to Canadian society and politics.Along with his continuing engagement in Canadian political life, Mel has always been an active scholar.Born in the Innis tradition of Canadian political economy, his thinking was shaped by the work of his contemporaries, including Kari Levitt, Jim Laxer, Tom Naylor, Wallace Clement, Stephen Hymer, and, above all, Abraham Rotstein.Through his many contributions to magazine columns, government reports, and books and scholarly journals, Mel profoundly influenced the intellectual development of Canadian political economy over the course of more than four
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.469 | 0.198 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".