MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380300549 · doi:10.59764/revicc.v3i4.34

Las Redes Sociales y su influencia en la Salud Mental de los estudiantes universitarios: Una Revisión Sistemática

2023· article· es· W4380300549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Anchundia-Garcia, Shirley Choez-Lucas, Aytor Erazo-Quinde

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA REVICC · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMental healthPsychologyScopusPhilosophyMEDLINEPsychotherapistPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los problemas de salud mental y su relación con las redes sociales son fenómenos relevantes de estudiar dada su alta incidencia y utilización entre los estudiantes universitarios. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue determinar la influencia de las redes sociales en la salud mental de los estudiantes universitarios y establecer factores de riesgos y posibles impactos. La búsqueda se realizó siguiendo la metodología PRISMA en los buscadores Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, Taylor and Francis y Medline, entre enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2021, además se evalúo la calidad metodológica a través de la escala Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS). Respecto a los resultados al término de la búsqueda se lograron identificar trece estudios relevantes para analizarlos. Al concluir se logró estipular que los altos niveles de uso de las redes sociales en estudiantes universitarios se correlacionaron con la aparición de depresión, ansiedad, estrés, adicción a internet, Fomo, problemas de aprendizaje y trastornos del sueño. Estos resultados deben llamar la atención de autoridades académicas y políticas para prevenir la aparición de problemas de salud mental en estudiantes universitarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREVISTA REVICCSame topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207