MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380318504 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287015

Childhood adversities and rate of adulthood all-cause hospitalization in the general population: A retrospective cohort study

2023· article· en· W4380318504 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Asmita Bhattarai, Gina Dimitropoulos, Andrew G. M. Bulloch, Suzanne Tough, Scott B. Patten

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsMedicineSocioeconomic statusDemographyPopulationSubstance abuseMediationPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The study examined the association between specific childhood adversities and rate of all-cause hospitalization in adulthood in a large sample of the general population and assessed whether adult socioeconomic and health-related factors mediate those associations. METHODS: We used linked data available from Statistics Canada i.e., the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS-2005) linked to Discharge Abstract Database (DAD 2005-2017) and Canadian Vital Statistics Database (CVSD 2005-2017). CCHS-2005 measured self-reported exposure to childhood adversities, namely prolonged hospitalization, parental divorce, parental unemployment, prolonged trauma, parental substance use, physical abuse, and being sent away from home for wrongdoing, from a sample of household residents aged 18 years and above (n = 11,340). The number and causes of hospitalization were derived from linkage with DAD. Negative binomial regression was used to characterize the association between childhood adversities and the rate of hospitalization and to identify potential mediators between them. RESULTS: During the 12-year follow-up, 37,080 hospitalizations occurred among the respondents, and there were 2,030 deaths. Exposure to at least one childhood adversity and specific adversities (except parental divorce) were significantly associated with the hospitalization rate among people below 65 years. The associations (except for physical abuse) were attenuated when adjusted for one or more of the adulthood factors such as depression, restriction of activity, smoking, chronic conditions, poor perceived health, obesity, unmet health care needs, poor education, and unemployment, observations that are consistent with mediation effects. The associations were not significant among those aged 65 and above. CONCLUSION: Childhood adversities significantly increased the rate of hospitalization in young and middle adulthood, and the effect was potentially mediated by adulthood socioeconomic status and health and health care access related factors. Health care overutilization may be reduced through primary prevention of childhood adversities and intervention on those potentially mediating pathways such as improving adulthood socioeconomic circumstances and lifestyle modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicChild Abuse and Trauma→French-language works237,207→