MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380343724 · doi:10.3917/heri.001.0017

Mode, luxe et ostentation dans les Antilles françaises au XVIII e  siècle

2022· article· fr· W4380343724 on OpenAlexaff
Albane Forestier

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire Europe et relations internationales · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article étudie la consommation vestimentaire de l’élite coloniale martiniquaise au xviii e siècle, et analyse la façon dont les récits d’observateurs et la transposition du débat sur le luxe aux Antilles ont façonné le discours sur la mode coloniale en la qualifiant d’ostentatoire. L’étude des liens commerciaux et financiers entre colons et marchands métropolitains permet de nuancer cette vision et de montrer comment les spécificités économiques et sociales du système mercantiliste ont défini les pratiques sartoriales des colons, et leur perception par le monde métropolitain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire Europe et relations internationales→Same topicColonialism, slavery, and trade→French-language works237,207→