MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4380354470 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad073.141

OUTC-04. SUBSEQUENT CNS MALIGNANCY AMONG SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD CANCER: A REPORT FROM THE CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVOR STUDY (CCSS)

2023· article· en· W4380354470 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Galvin, Yan Chen, Yan Yuan, Tabitha Cooney, Rebecca M. Howell, Susan A. Smith, Michael Arnold, Miriam Conces, Wendy M. Leisenring, Leslie L. Robison, Gregory T. Armstrong, Joseph P. Neglia, Lucie M. Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Cumulative incidenceConfidence intervalCancerInternal medicineRadiation therapyChildhood cancerMalignancyOncologyPediatricsCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) of the central nervous system (CNS) following childhood cancer are a frequently fatal late effect of cancer therapy. We used the CCSS (5-year childhood cancer survivors, diagnosed 1970-1999) to assess whether temporal changes in therapy have reduced CNS SMN risk. Twenty-year cumulative incidence rates (95% confidence interval) were estimated, and standardized incidence ratios (SIR, 95% CI) were calculated comparing observed to expected rates from SEER. Multivariable models assessed demographic and treatment-related risk factors for CNS SMN. Among survivors diagnosed between 1970-1979 (N=6223), 1980-1989 (N=9680), and 1990–1999 (N=8999) with median follow-up of 40.5, 32.2, and 22.6 years, respectively, 157 CNS SMNs (1970s, 52; 1980s, 63; 1990s, 42) were identified, excluding meningiomas. Malignant gliomas (N=131) were the most common SMNs. Cranial radiotherapy (CRT) exposure decreased by treatment decade, with the proportion of survivors receiving no CRT increasing from 23.0% (1970s), to 45.7% (1980s), and 66% (1990s). Decreases in >0–10Gy exposure (39.0% to 14.1%) and 20.1–30Gy (19.2% to 2.4%) were observed while those receiving >30Gy CRT has not substantially changed (12%, 11.1%, and 8.8%, respectively). Twenty-year cumulative incidence and SIR for development of SMN were 0.32% (0.18-0.46%) and 6.6 (5.0–8.7); 0.55% (0.41-0.70%) and 8.3 (6.6-10.4); and 0.43% (0.31-0.55%) and 9.2 (7.0–12.0), respectively, with no statistically significant differences between treatment eras, including when stratified by attained age. Multivariate analysis showed increased risk for all CRT dose levels >10Gy and for primary diagnoses of medulloblastoma/PNET (HR 3.6, 2.0-6.6) and astrocytoma (HR 2.4, 1.4-3.9). Three-year cumulative incidences of death after SMN, by treatment decade, were 70%, 73%, and 69%, respectively. In conclusion, CNS SMN incidence has not decreased despite fewer survivors being treated with CRT, and CNS SMNs remain a significant source of mortality for affected patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→