Defining Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth by Culture and High Throughput Sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background& Aims Despite accelerated research in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), questions remain regarding optimal diagnostic approaches and definitions. Here, we aim to define SIBO using small bowel culture and sequencing, identifying specific contributory microbes, in the context of gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods Subjects undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (without colonoscopy) were recruited and completed symptom severity questionnaires. Duodenal aspirates were plated on MacConkey and blood agar. Aspirate DNA was analyzed by 16S ribosomal RNA and shotgun sequencing. Microbial network connectivity for different SIBO thresholds and predicted microbial metabolic functions were also assessed. Results A total of 385 subjects with <10 3 colony forming units (CFU)/mL on MacConkey agar and 98 subjects with ≥10 3 CFU/mL, including ≥10 3 to <10 5 CFU/mL (N = 66) and ≥10 5 CFU/mL (N = 32), were identified. Duodenal microbial α-diversity progressively decreased, and relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella and Klebsiella increased, in subjects with ≥10 3 to <10 5 CFU/mL and ≥10 5 CFU/mL. Microbial network connectivity also progressively decreased in these subjects, driven by the increased relative abundance of Escherichia ( P < .0001) and Klebsiella ( P = .0018). Microbial metabolic pathways for carbohydrate fermentation, hydrogen production, and hydrogen sulfide production were enhanced in subjects with ≥10 3 CFU/mL and correlated with symptoms. Shotgun sequencing (N = 38) identified 2 main Escherichia coli strains and 2 Klebsiella species representing 40.24% of all duodenal bacteria in subjects with ≥10 3 CFU/mL. Conclusions Our findings confirm ≥10 3 CFU/mL is the optimal SIBO threshold, associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, significantly decreased microbial diversity, and network disruption. Microbial hydrogen- and hydrogen sulfide–related pathways were enhanced in SIBO subjects, supporting past studies. Remarkably few specific E coli and Klebsiella strains/species appear to dominate the microbiome in SIBO, and correlate with abdominal pain, diarrhea, and bloating severities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".