MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380368547 · doi:10.3917/entre.hs4.0177

A Comparative Analysis of the Resilience of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Cases of Ambositra, Antananarivo and Antsiranana

2023· article· fr· W4380368547 on OpenAlexaff
Tinasoa Razafindrazaka, Étienne St-Jean, Claudine Ratsimbazafy

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Entrepreneuriat · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La résilience à l’échelle d’un écosystème entrepreneurial (ÉE) rend compte d’un processus de transformabilité par lequel des acteurs résilients résorbent des tensions. Nous étudions celle-ci dans le contexte de trois ÉE malgaches par une analyse comparative de récits phénoménologiques des acteurs concernés. Nos résultats démontrent que la résilience peut être réactive ou proactive, comme observé ailleurs, mais fait ressortir un nouveau type, soit la résilience atone. Nos résultats soulignent que la résilience d’un ÉE implique un processus disruptif, une endogénéité et un encastrement du phénomène, ainsi qu’une perspective dialogique (collectif et individus).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’EntrepreneuriatSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207