MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380372795 · doi:10.31599/jpa.v1i1.2012

PELATIHAN CAPACITY BUILDING SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBERDAYAAN PEREMPUAN DI KAMPUNG MUARA GEMBONG

2023· article· id· W4380372795 on OpenAlexaff
Eka Putri Christiani Hutagalung, Wisnu Adi Wicaksono, Budi Sarasati, Adi Muhajirin

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Psikologi Atribusi Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan penulis dan tim penelitian memberikan sosialisasi capacity building, adalah untuk membantu meningkatkan pemahaman dan kemampuan masyarakat Kampung Sungai Labuh khususnya ibu-ibu rumah tangga di sana agar bisa memberdayakan diri sendiri untuk membantu perekonomian keluarga, karena dari hasil observasi penulis dan tim penelitian kebanyakan masyarakat di sana belum mampu mengelola suatu usaha sehingga mereka sangat bergantung pada musim dan kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat akan potensi sumber daya alam daerahnya yang melimpah. Sasaran lokasi pelaksanaan kegiatan ini bertempat di Kampung Sungai Labuh, dan lokasi berlangsungnya acara di Pondok Pesantren Fastabiqul Khairots, Jl. Kp. Sungai Labuh, Desa Pantai Harapan Jaya RT 02 RW 014, Kecamatan Muara Gembong Kabupaten Bekasi Jawa Barat. Dari lingkungan tersebut terdapat 20 orang ibu rumah tangga yang ingin berpartisipasi dalam rangkaian kegiatan riset hibah desa ini, dimana salah satu kegiatannya adalah sosialisasi dan pelatihan capacity building, yang didalamnya ada sosialisasi dan pelatihan membuat eco enzyme untuk membantu ibu-ibu rumah tangga Kampung Sungai Labuh bisa mandiri dan berdikari membantu perekonomian keluarganya. Hasil kegiatan dan manfaat penulis dan tim penelitian memberikan pelatihan capacity building adalah untuk membantu masyarakat Kampung Sungai Labuh, khususnya ibu-ibu rumah tangga agar mempunyai pemahaman dan kemampuan baru untuk modal usaha rumahan yang berguna sebagai pemasukan tambahan di keluarganya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Psikologi Atribusi Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207