Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the work. Put into scientific circulation and analyze the letters of the composer, choral conductor, teacher, activist of "Prosvita", Ukrainian patriot Serhii Fedorovych Telezhynskyi to the outstanding conductor and popularizer of Ukrainian song Oleksandr Koshyts. Also draw the attention of researchers to the little-known figure of Serhii Telezhynskyi, his professional activities and reduce the number of white spots in his biography. The research methodology is based on biographical, prosopographical and historical-logical methods, thanks to which it is possible to analyze the correspondence of two outstanding cultural figures of Ukraine in the conditions of Stalin's totalitarian regime. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the introduction into scientific circulation of S. F. Telezhynskyi's letters, which are stored in O. A. Koshyts' own fond at the Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Center (Oseredok) in Winnipeg (Manitoba, Canada) and is a unique and at the same time difficult-to-access source for the history of Ukrainian culture. Conclusions. To reveal an important aspect of the biographies of S. Telezhynskyi and O. Koshyts regarding the possible return of the latter to his homeland, the disclosure of the circumstances in which the return took place and developed, in particular in the conditions of strengthening of the totalitarian regime in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, their correspondence is undoubtedly a valuable source. Analysis of S. F. Telezhynskyi's correspondence reveals his sincere desire to serve his homeland, his organizational activities with the involvement of the best forces in the musical industry in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, in particular the son of the famous Ukrainian composer M. V. Lysenko - Ostap.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".