Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the German occupation and until his deportation in December 1941, Klein worked on several ambitious chamber works consecutively. Some are complete, or finished enough to be performed, but there are a number of fragments which are too incomplete for realisation. The Divertimento was a work in progress from June 1939, and completed in April 1940. The almost-complete Duo for Violin and Viola in the Quarter-Tone System was embarked on in late December 1939, when he was staying in Přerov, and was worked upon certainly until late February. The Preludium for Viola Solo is dated 3 April, and May and June 1940 were taken up with the Three Songs for High Voice and Piano , Op. 1. He worked on the String Quartet, Op. 2, for a year, from August 1940 until the following August. The incomplete Duo for Violin and Cello is dated November 1941. The string pieces among this group of works are very much companion works, exploring similar language and demonstrating his increasing confidence in writing for these instruments. The fair-copy manuscript of the Duo for Violin and Viola in the Quarter-Tone System carries the inscription ‘To Prof. Alois Hába in respect and devotion’, a fitting dedication for a work which draws on Hába's pioneering accomplishments in quarter-tone, or microtonal, music, and Klein's only music to employ Hába's system. His fair copy is of the first two movements only. The sketch of the third movement is reasonably detailed in terms of performance indications, although it replaces an aborted, crossed-out third movement, running to over 40 bars. In the absence of tempo and dynamics at its opening, the published edition of the Duo, edited by Milan Slavický and Vojtěch Saudek, proposes a maestoso and mezzo forte opening for the third movement. The aborted third movement opens Andante , with the instruments muted, and it can be argued that the extant third movement should follow this type of character, too, thereby providing some elegiac respite in an otherwise energetic work. The sketch of the fourth movement is also detailed, but is incomplete by its 34th bar. There is also an undated and incomplete Hába-inspired sketch with the title Fantasietta – Hába often used the title ‘Fantasy’ in his works – also for violin and viola in the quarter-tone system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.094 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".