MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380446195 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2022-0699

Characteristics and mechanism of large deformation of squeezing tunnel in phyllite stratum

2023· article· en· W4380446195 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jinpeng Zhao, Zhongsheng Tan, Q Li, Lei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhylliteGeotechnical engineeringGeologyStratumDeformation (meteorology)Rock mass classificationDeformation mechanismFailure mechanismShear (geology)Mining engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringPetrologyStructural engineeringMetamorphic rockComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Maoxian Tunnel in Sichuan, China has experienced significant deformation and supporting failure in the surrounding phyllite rock. To address this problem, on-site engineering geological investigation and testing methods were deployed in the present study to examine the characteristics and mechanism of deformation in the tunnel. Scanning electron microscopy, rock hydraulic tests, and uniaxial compressive tests were used to investigate the hydraulic and mechanical properties of the surrounding rock, and to examine the mechanisms underlying the significant deformation. The results suggest that the large deformation in Maoxian Tunnel is a result of shear expansion and progressive failure of the soft rock under high stress. To enhance the integrity and self-sustaining ability of the rock mass, it is necessary to promptly construct support structures and reinforce the surrounding rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207