#6287 EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS, COGNITIVE FUNCTION, AND BONE IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a process in which a brief period of ischemia is induced in one part of the body to protect another part from damage due to subsequent periods of more severe ischemia. Hemodialysis sessions are considered an ischemic process because it involves reducing blood flow to certain parts of the body, which can lead to tissue damage .Malnutrition, deterioration of cognitive function, bone disorders, cardiovascular disease, and hemodynamic instability can result from ischemia induced by hemodialysis sessions. These adverse effects increase mortality in HD patients. RIPC has been studied as a potential therapeutic strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients; however, the effect of RIPC on cognitive function, nutritional status, and bone disorder among hemodialysis patients has not been enough studied. Aim: to assess the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on nutritional status, bone disorders, and cognitive function in hemodialysis patients at the urology and nephrology center, Mansoura University. Method Fifty patients who received regular hemodialysis for more than one year in our dialysis unit were included. The patients were randomized (single-blind) into two groups a control group (20 patients) and an intervention group (30 patients). Before each HD session, sphygmomanometer cuffs was placed around the non-vascular access arm. Three cycles of ischemia for five minutes were performed followed by reperfusion for five minutes. Ischemia was induced by inflating the sphygmomanometer cuffs to 200 mmHg. This maneuver was done before each HD session for 12 weeks. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used to assess cognitive function. The nutritional state was assessed by anthropometric measurement (body weight, BMI), laboratory (serum albumin and serum cholesterol), and Subjective Global Assessment Form (SGA). Serum calcium (s.Ca) and serum phosphorus (s.po), serum alkaline phosphate (s. ALP) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) were used as indices for bone profile. Results The intervention group include 30 patient with mean age (36+/-10), 19 male (63.3%) and 11 females (36.7%). The control group include 20 patient with mean age (46+/-9), 12 male (60%) and eight female (40%). None of these patients’ demographic data (age, sex, original kidney disease, and duration of dialysis) were significantly different between the study groups (P>0.05). MOCA test score at baseline was (24.5 +/-2.6) at intervention group and (24.4+/-3.2) at control group, and after 12 weeks intervention was (24.8 +/-2.2) at intervention group and (24.4+/-2.8) at control group. there were no statistical significance regarding cognitive function between the two group over time (p = 0.4). NO significant Statistical changes in anthropometric measurements (Body weight (p = 0.3) and BMI (P = 0.6) were found between the two groups. Additionally, no significant changes (serum albumin and cholesterol) were detected. SGA score at baseline was at intervention group (1.2+/-0.4) and control group (1.1 +/- 0.3), and after 12 week was at the intervention group (1.4 +/-0.5) and control group (1.6 +/-0.5). SGA showed no statistical significance between the two groups over time (p = 0.2). No significant statistical changes regarding bone profile (s.ca (p = 0.5), s.PO (p = 0.2), s.ALP (p = 0.7) and iPTH (p = 0.5)). Conclusion Although some studies showed a beneficial effect of RIBC on reduction of cardiovascular risk, our study found no significant effect on cognitive function, nutritional status, and bone disorders among hemodialysis patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".