A framework for pronunciation error detection and correction for non-native Arab speakers of English language
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines speakers’ systematic errors while speaking English as a foreign language (EFL) among students in Arab countries with the purpose of automatically recognizing and correcting mispronunciations using speech recognition, phonological features, and machine learning. Accordingly, three main steps are implemented towards this purpose: identifying the most frequently wrongly pronounced phonemes by Arab students, analyzing the systematic errors these students make in doing so, and developing a framework that can aid the detection and correction of these pronunciation errors. The proposed automatic detection and correction framework used the collected and labeled data to construct a customized acoustic model to identify and correct incorrect phonemes. Based on the trained data, the language model is then used to recognize the words. The final step includes construction samples of both correct and incorrect pronunciation in the phonemes model and then using machine learning to identify and correct the errors. The results showed that one of the main causes of such errors was the confusion that leads to wrongly utilizing a given sound in place of another. The automatic framework identified and corrected 98.2% of the errors committed by the students using a decision tree classifier. The decision tree classifier achieved the best recognition results compared to the five classifiers used for this purpose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".