MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380450734 · doi:10.52202/069179-0426

LIMBERLOST PLACE: A 10-STOREY SLAB-BANDED STRUCTURE

2023· article· en· W4380450734 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Md Shahnewaz, Robert Jackson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsSlabGeorge (robot)GeologyEngineeringCivil engineeringStructural engineeringArchitectural engineeringArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $150M Limberlost Place (previously known as "The Arbour") is a 10-storey, 16,250 m 2 , exposed tall wood building located on George Brown College's waterfront campus in Toronto, Canada.This project will serve as an educational hub for George Brown College, housing the Tall Wood Research Institute, a childcare centre in addition to a significant amount of teaching and social spaces for their architectural program.Fast + Epp developed an innovative large span beamless structural system that is comprised of CLT timber-concrete composite (TCC) slab bands with perpendicular CLT infill panels supported on glulam columns.This long-span flat plate system allows for flexibility in architectural programming and unobstructed mechanical distribution.An extensive testing program on the TCC slab bands was completed at the University of Northern British Columbia in 2020, which has provided valuable engineering information to the design community for future tall wood projects and composite systems.To facilitate innovation, the project received funding through the National Resources Canada Green Constriction Wood Program, alongside other partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTree Root and Stability StudiesFrench-language works237,207