MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380450830 · doi:10.52202/069179-0571

CASE STUDY ON A LARGE-SCALE TIMBER ACADEMIC BUILDING DESIGNED TO ADDRESS CURRENT INDUSTRY CHALLENGES

2023· article· en· W4380450830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban and spatial planning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectural engineeringFlexibility (engineering)AmenitySustainabilityStructural systemCivil engineeringEngineeringConstruction engineeringComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for more sustainable construction has led to the desire to increase the use of wood materials in our buildings.However, challenges in terms of larger column grids, future design flexibility, and fire resistance have occurred in institutional, commercial, and industrial building types that have hindered mass timber's adoption.This study reviews these challenges and provides insight into the design of a mass timber academic building as a viable design solution.The building creates open-concept and future flexible spaces by taking advantage of several novel structural solutions, while achieving fire resistance requirements.The structural solutions include the long span hollowcore mass timber floor panels for large amenity areas, two flat plate "service towers", and a combination of timber braced frames and CLT shear walls for the lateral system, in order to meet the challenges faced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban and spatial planningFrench-language works237,207