MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380451083 · doi:10.1109/lmwt.2023.3280395

Tunable Wideband High-Order Active Analog Delays With High Delay-Bandwidth Product

2023· article· en· W4380451083 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra Kabirkhoo, Mohammad Radpour, Leonid Belostotski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCMC MicrosystemsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsWidebandBandwidth (computing)NotationCMOSComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsArithmeticEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter describes analog delays based on wideband, high-order, tunable active all-pass filters (APFs) with poles and zeros prescribed by the Padé approximation. The number of inductors in the${n}$th-order APF does not exceed$\lfloor n/2\rfloor $for a compact area, low insertion loss, and wide bandwidth. Delay tuning is accomplished via two control lines. The proposed sixth-order APF, implemented in TSMC 65-nm CMOS, exhibits a delay range from 250 ps (BW10%= 0–8 GHz) to 400 ps (BW10%= 0–5 GHz) and achieves the state-of-the-art DBW10%= 2 for wideband APFs. Third- and fourth-order APFs were subsequently designed in GlobalFoundries 22-nm FDSOI CMOS for a 5G beamforming receiver operating from 24.3 to 28.7 GHz. The third- and fourth-order APFs exhibited 9–21 and 21–36 ps delay ranges, respectively, to generate beams from 0° to 35°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology LettersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207