MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380480447 · doi:10.1111/padr.12562

The US Council of Economic Advisers on Changing Female Labor Force Participation

2023· article· en· W4380480447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePopulation and Development Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabour economicsBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Population and Development ReviewEarly View DOCUMENTS The US Council of Economic Advisers on Changing Female Labor Force Participation First published: 13 June 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12562Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Abraham, K., and M. Kearney. 2020. “Examining the Decline in the U.S. Employment-to-Population Ratio: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Economic Literature 58(3): 585– 643. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191480 Baker, M., J. Gruber, and K. Milligan. 2008. “Universal Child Care, Maternal Labor Supply, and Family Well-Being.” Journal of Political Economy 116(4): 709– 745. https://doi.org/10.1086/591908 Black, S., D. Schanzenbach, and A. Breitwieser. 2017. “ The Recent Decline in Women's Labor Force Participation.” Hamilton Project. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/es_10192017_decline_womens_labor_force_participation_blackschanzenbach.pdf. Blau, F., and L. Kahn. 2013. “Female Labor Supply: Why Is the United States Falling Behind?” American Economic Review 103(3): 251– 256. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.251 BLS (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2019. “ Number and Percent of Eldercare Providers Who Were Parents of Household Children Under Age 18 by Sex and Selected Characteristics, Averages for the Combined Years 2017–2018.” https://www.bls.gov/news.release/elcare.t09.htm. BLS (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2022. “ Employee Benefits in the United States.” https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2022/home.him. Council of Economic Advisers. 2015. Economic Report of the President. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2015-ERP.pdf. Gelbach, J. 2002. “Public Schooling for Young Children and Maternal Labor Supply.” American Economic Review 92(1): 307– 322. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828.02760015748 Goldin, C. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family.” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 1– 21, https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/the_quiet_revolution_that_transformed_womens_employment_education_and_family.pdf. Haeck, C., P. Lefebvre, and P. Merrigan. 2015. “Canadian Evidence on Ten Years of Universal Preschool Policies: The Good and the Bad.” Labour Economics, 36: 137– 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.05.002 Maiello, M. 2017. “ Diagnosing William Baumol's Cost Disease.” Chicago Booth Review. https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/diagnosing-william-baumolscost-disease. Morrissey, T. 2017. “Child Care and Parent Labor Force Participation: A Review of the Research Literature.” Review of Economics of the Household 15(1): 1– 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9331-3. National Partnership for Women and Families. 2022. “ State Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Laws.” https://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/economic-justice/paid-leave/state-paid-family-leave-laws.pdf. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2019. “ Public Spending on Childcare and Early Education.” OECD Family Database. https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/PF3_1_Public_spending_on_childcare_and_early_education.pdf. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2022. “ LFS by Sex and Age: Indicators.” https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?r=967539#. Shen, K. 2021. “ Who Benefits from Public Financing of Home Care for Low-Income Seniors?” Working paper, Harvard University. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/kshen/files/caregivers.pdf. Siminski, P., and R. Yetsenga. 2022. “Specialization, Comparative Advantage, and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics 40(4): https://doi.org/10.1086/718430. Ziliak, J. 2014. “ Supporting Low-Income Workers through Refundable Child-Care Credits.” Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/supporting-low-income-workers-through-refundable-child-care-credits/. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it