The Technique of Formation of Valuable Attitude for Amateur Theatre by Future Leaders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamic development of theater culture in Russia, including the culture of Amateur theater, the growing popularity of Amateur theater in modern society, and the awareness of Amateur theater as a phenomenon of Russian national culture makes it urgent to improve the training of managers of Amateur theater groups in institutions of arts and culture. The study of literature, generalization of practical experience, and experimental research data led the authors to the conclusion that the direction of this improvement is to educate students in a value attitude to Amateur theater and their chosen profession. The functions of value attitude education: epistemological (knowledge), axiological (value), regulatory-normative and creative. Components of the pedagogical model: adaptive-diagnostic, planned-correctional, informational-activity, variative-creative, evaluative-effective. The results of the chosen pedagogical model gave positive results, which makes it possible to consider the proposed way to improve the training of specialists correct and appropriate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it