Uncovering Partnership among Village Stakeholders in Village Governance: An Evidence from East Java, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study uncovers the partnership interactions that occur in village government in East Java and aims to determine the partnership, described and explained in the form of a quadrant-type of analysis through two dimensions of Government and Non-partnership. The existence of two institutions (village government and BPD) that carried out village governance requires a robust partnership and mutual interactions among both in the implementation of their activities, the pattern of partnership relations itself has become a trend in public administration and good governance practices, where partnerships are considered capable of increasing the effectiveness of governance in the provision of public services. The data analysis used in this research is descriptive quantitative by measuring the mean of two dimensions, so that it can describe the quadrant that explains the partnership relationship between the two institutions. The results of this analysis indicate that the partnership relationship that occurs occupies the partnership quadrant, meaning that there is a high alliance between the two institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it