MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380484899 · doi:10.3390/app13127052

Progress of Machine Vision Technologies in Intelligent Dairy Farming

2023· article· en· W4380484899 on OpenAlexaff
Yongan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Lina Zhang, Jia Li, Meian Li, Yanqiu Liu, Yanyu Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Inner MongoliaChina Scholarship CouncilInner Mongolia Agricultural UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceDairy cattleMachine visionLamenessEngineeringComputer scienceMedicineAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large-scale and precise intelligent breeding mode for dairy cows is the main direction for the development of the dairy industry. Machine vision has become an important technological means for the intelligent breeding of dairy cows due to its non-invasive, low-cost, and multi-behavior recognition capabilities. This review summarizes the recent application of machine vision technology, machine learning, and deep learning in the main behavior recognition of dairy cows. The authors summarized identity recognition technology based on facial features, muzzle prints, and body features of dairy cows; motion behavior recognition technology such as lying, standing, walking, drinking, eating, rumination, estrus; and the recognition of common diseases such as lameness and mastitis. Based on current research results, machine vision technology will become one of the important technological means for the intelligent breeding of dairy cows. Finally, the author also summarized the advantages of this technology in intelligent dairy farming, as well as the problems and challenges faced in the next development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207