The genetic relationship between coeval Ediacaran mafic and granitoid plutons in the Antigonish Highlands, Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Granitic plutons dominated by felsic-intermediate compositions are commonly spatially and temporally associated with mafic intrusions; however, the genetic relationship between the apparently coeval but compositionally dissimilar magmas is controversial. To better understand this relationship, we present new lithogeochemical and isotopic data from coeval late Neoproterozoic plutonic rocks in the Antigonish Highlands of Nova Scotia where the regional context is well documented. The predominantly mafic Greendale Complex contains lamprophyre, appinites and leucocratic dykes. The appinites are remarkably variable in their textures, and consist of hornblende pegmatites, hornblende cumulates, porphyritic hornblende gabbro and coarse-grained, equigranular hornblende gabbro. Geochemical data show enrichment in large-ion lithophile elements and depletion in the high field strength elements suggesting an arc setting. ε Nd (607) values from the Greendale Complex range from +3.2 to +5.0 and are on average slightly more juvenile than coeval granitic rocks which have petrological characteristics typical of continental arc magmas. Hydrous mafic magmas were likely contaminated by subducted sediments and their ascent was facilitated by lithospheric-scale faults. Felsic magmas were derived by anatexis of heterogeneous Avalonian crust that oscillated between fluid-saturated to fluid-deficient (dehydration) melting, consistent with the evolution from arc to intra-arc rift environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".