MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4380520757 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.331

Modern Trends in the Tax Audit Market

2022· article· en· W4380520757 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alla A. Udovikova, Irina N. Marchenkova

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Policy Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditBusinessAccountingService (business)FinanceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Russia transited to market relations, it formed an independent audit service, which emergence prerequisites were the mutual interest of state bodies, the managing administration of the enterprise and its owners in reliable financial and accounting information. The audit has become an integral part of economic relations and has been recognized by most countries of the world. This was facilitated by the need for means of implementing and protecting property interests, enhancing economic benefits and minimizing entrepreneurial risk. The main aim of the study is to investigate the market economy and tax audit market, which determine the development of new activities for the implementation and regulation of economic relations, predetermined the creation of organizations that regulate the processes of accounting and tax accounting. To accomplish that aim, the methods of deduction, induction, systematization and generalization of theoretical and practical materials are utilized. Based on the outcomes, a new type of activity at that time was an audit, which provided protection of the legal property interests of business entities by means of independent financial control, confirmation of the authenticity of balance sheets and reports on the results of economic activities, and the provision of related services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicLegal and Policy IssuesFrench-language works237,207